PESHAWAR: The government has decided to restore school health and nutrition services to scale up awareness about prevention of illness among the students and provide them with timely therapy, according to. The province discontinued school …
Following announced funding cuts in US universities, is it altogether paranoid to wonder if humanities are under assault since they are enable students to guess?
Humanities departments in America are once again being axed. The reasons, one hears, are economic rather than ideological. Its not that schools dont am worried about the humanities they just cant afford them. But if one looks at these institutions priorities, one determines a concealed ideology at work.
Earlier this month, the State University of New York( Suny) Stony Brook announced a plan to eliminate several of the colleges well-regarded departments for budgetary reasons. Undergraduates will no longer be able to major in comparative literature, cinema and cultural analysis or theater arts.
Three doctoral programs would be cut, and three departments( European languages and literature, Hispanic speeches and literature, and cultural analyses) would be merged into one. Not only students but faculty will be affected; many untenured educators would lose their jobs, and doctoral nominees would have to finish their studies elsewhere.
This is happening at a time in which high salaries are awarded to college administrators that dwarf those of a junior or even senior faculty member teach in at-risk departments. That difference can only be explained through ideology. The decision to reduce education to a corporate consumer-driven model, providing services to the student-client, is ideological too.
Suny Stony Brook is expending millions on a multiyear program entitled Far Beyond that is intended to rebrand the colleges image: a redesigned logo and website, new signs, flags and flags throughout the campus. Do colleges now care more about how a school looks and marketplaces itself than about what it teaches? Has the university become a theme park: Collegeland, churning out workers trained to fill particular niches? Far beyond what?
The threat of cuts that Suny Stony Brook is facing is not entirely new. In 2010, Suny Albany announced that it was get rid of its Russian, classics, theater, French and Italian departments a decision afterwards rescinded. The University of Pittsburgh has cut its German, classics and religion analyses program.
This problem has parallels internationally. In the UK, protests greeted Middlesex Universitys 2010 decision to phase out its doctrine department. In June 2015, the Japanese ministers responsible for education sent a letter to the presidents of “the member states national” universities of Japan, suggesting they close their alumnu and undergraduate departments in the humanities and social sciences and focus on something more practical.
Most lately, the Hungarian government announced regulations that would basically make it impossible for the Central European University, funded by George Soros, to function in Budapest.
These are hard times. Students necessitate chores when they alumnu. But a singular opportunity has been lost if they are denied the opportunity to study foreign speeches, the classics, literature, dogma, music, theater and art. When else in their busy lives will they get that chance?
Eloquent defenses of the humanities have appeared essays explaining why we need these subjects, what their loss would entail. Those of us who teach and analyse are aware of what these areas of learning provide: the ability to think critically and independently; to tolerate ambiguity; to see the two sides of an issue; to look beneath the surface of what we are being told; to appreciate the ways in which language can help us understand one another more clearly and profoundly or, alternately, how speech can disguise and falsify. They help us learn how to think, and they equip us to live in to sustain a democracy.
Studying the classics and creed teaches students where we come from, and how our modes of reasoning have evolved over time. Learning foreign speeches, and about other cultures, enables students to understand how other societies resemble or differ from our own. Is it solely paranoid to wonder if these subjects are under assault because they enable students to think in ways that are more complex than the reductive simplifications so congenial to our current political and corporate discourse?
I dont believe that the humanities can stimulate you a decent person. We know that Hitler was an ardent Wagner fan and had a lively those who are interested in architecture. But literature, art and music can focus and expand our sense of what humen can accomplish and generate. The humanities teach us about those who have gone before us; a foreign language brings us closer to those with whom we share the planet.
The humanities can touch those aspects of consciousness that we call intellect and heart organs seemingly absence among lawmakers whose opinions on health care indicate not only zero compassion but a poor understanding of human experience, with its crisis and setbacks.
Courses in the humanities are as formative and beneficial as the class that will replace them. Instead of Shakespeare or French, there will be( perhaps there already are) college class in how to trim corporate spending courses that inform us to remove frivolous programs of analyze that might actually teach students to think.
Read more: www.theguardian.com
This woman is a certifiable evil genius. Her Halloween garb building robot appears to have been harmless fun, but this machine is going to take away endeavours … more importantly, my undertaking as a slapstick writer.
If I got an assignment to come up with funny Halloween attires, I’d likely go with “a hydrant get whizzed on by a dog” because I’m emotionally bankrupt. This Halloween-o-Matic-5 000 has endless stamen and can stimulate 20 funny garb ideas in the time it takes me to unwrap the chocolate bar I need for “creative fuel.”
In the AI’s infancy( it was still learning) it came up with “Sexy Por Man, ” “The Ran Spean Sexy Sexy Pon Sexy Dander, ” “The Gull Wot, ” “Sexy Purbie Lampire, ” and, “Poth Rat.” It’s not even in proper English and yet it constructs so much sense. I don’t know what a “Purbie Lampire” is, or how it is feasible to sexy, but it’s funny and I require that costume. “The Gull Wot” is nonsense, but I can somehow painting it being played by Danny DeVito.
And those are just the things it came up with as a baby robot. It accommodates. It learns. As a toddler, it generated dress such as, “Farbat of the Cower, ” and “Ging Butter.” Still babble, and still funnier than anything I could think of with my inferior meat brain. But as Halloween-o-Matic-5 000 learns, its comedy becomes even more sophisticated. The Shark Knight.” Oh sweet mom Mary of Jesus. The robot simply punned . “Vampire Big Bird.” “Professor Panda.” “Count Drunk Doll of Princess.” “Skeleton Ginsburg.” “Saxy Pumpkins.”
Well, there runs my job security and my good night’s sleep. Skeleton Ginsburg . It’s perfection beyond what human comedians are capable of. I may soon be replaced by a robot, forced out of the lucrative slapstick business and into an embarrassing chore like doctoring, but damnit I’ll still laugh at their gags. “Bearley Quinn? ” Yep, that’s it. We’re done. It’s the singularity.
Read more: www.cracked.com
President Donald Trump used an interview with a conservative news outlet friendly to his administration to push back against U.S. intelligence officers’ conclusion that Russia interfered in last year’s election to help him win, claiming that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored his foe Hillary Clinton.
” We are the most powerful country in the world and we are getting more and more powerful because I’m a big military person. As two examples, if Hillary had won, our military would be decimated. Our energy would be much more expensive ,” he said in an excerpt of the interview with evangelical leader Pat Robertson, which is set to air Thursday.” That’s what Putin doesn’t like about me. And that’s why I say,’ Why would he want me ?’ Because from day one I wanted a strong military; he doesn’t want to see that .”
The interview, the president’s first in several weeks, comes amid mounting scandals in his administration. Trump’s eldest son the coming week acknowledged he met with a Kremlin-linked lawyer promising damaging information on Clinton in June of 2016, the most significant indication that his campaign may have colluded with Russia leading up to the election.
Trump was not asked about the session in the excerpts of the interview released Wednesday, but in a statement Tuesday he defended his son as” a high-quality person” and, in a tweet, “ve called the” news part of” a witch hunt .”
In claiming that Putin would not have intervened to help Trump, the president told Robertson that Clinton ” wants to have windmills ,” seemingly referring to the use of wind energy, which he frequently criticized during the campaign.
” From day one, I want fracking and everything else to get energy costs low and to create tremendous energy. We’re going to be self-supporting, we just about are now. We’re going to be exporting energy — he doesn’t want that ,” Trump said of Putin.
” He would like Hillary where she wants to have windmills. He would much rather have that because energy costs would go up and Russia as you know relies very much on energy. So there are many things that I do that are the exact opposite of what he would want ,” he continued.” So what I maintain hearing about, that he would have instead had Trump, I think’ probably not ,’ because I want a strong military. You know she wouldn’t have expended the money on military. When I want tremendous energy, we’re opening up coal, we’re opening hours natural gas, we’re opening hours fracking, all the things that he would dislike, but nobody ever had noted that .”
As president, Trump has given relatively few interviews and press conferences, and most have been to favorable outlets like Fox News. The interview with Robertson, on his Christian Broadcasting Network present” The 700 Club ,” was likely a style to speak candidly in friendly province, amid the mounting scandals facing his administration, and to reaching evangelicals, a group whose subsistence Trump frequently touts.
A former” 700 Club” producer wrote last month that Robertson’s indicate pre-dated Fox News in creating a right-wing media outlet that” exploited assaulting the press in order to insert ourselves to the right of everybody else in presenting a Biblical, a.k.a. Republican view on current events .”
” We offered a daily news program that expressed Republican party talking points that we marketed as a Christian worldview ,” Terry Heaton wrote.
In the interview videotapeed Wednesday, Robertson asked Trump about the Senate Republican health care bill, telling Trump” the iniquitous Obamacare has got to go and be replaced .”
When asked what would happen if the bill failed, given that its passage is in doubt, Trump said:” I don’t even would like to speak about it .”
” I will be very angry about it and a lot of people will be very upset. But I’m sitting waiting for that bill to come to my desk ,” he said.” I hope that they do it .”
Trump also boasted about his meeting last week with Putin at the G-2 0 summit.
” Everyone was surprised by the amount of hour, but that was a good thing and not a bad thing. Yeah, I think we get on with very well and I think that’s a good thing, that’s not a bad thing ,” Trump said.” People said,’ Oh they shouldn’t get along.’ Well, who are the people that are saying that? I think we get on with very, very well. We are a tremendously powerful nuclear power, and so are they. It doesn’t make sense not to have some kind of a relationship .”
Read more: www.huffingtonpost.com
Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway Inc. bet on the biggest U.S. airlines, reversing decades of aversion to the industry.
Berkshire held 21.8 million shares of American Airlines Group Inc. as of Sept. 30, valued at virtually $800 million at the time, according to a regulatory filing Monday from the billionaires Omaha, Nebraska-based business. Buffetts company also reported 6.33 million shares of Delta Air Lines Inc. and another 4.53 million of United Continental Holding Inc ., in agreement with the filing. And Berkshire added an investment in Southwest Airline Co. after Sept. 30, CNBC reported, quoting Buffett.
What this says is, The operating isnt over for airlines, Stifel Nicolaus& Co. analyst Joe DeNardi said. Theres still a lot of this story to play out.”
Airline shares surged in 2014 but failed to sustain their rally on concerns about rising ga prices and labor expenditures. By 2018, the spike in employee expenses may be behind the industry, DeNardi said. The Bloomberg U.S. Airlines Index has gained about 1.8 percentage this year through Mondays close. That trails the 5.9 percent advance of the S& P 500 Index.
Buffett have all along bet on the growth of the U.S. economy by the investment in transportation. Berkshire owns the BNSF railway, the McLane trucking operation and a network of automobile dealerships. And while the conglomerate also has the NetJets luxury aviation unit and Precision Castparts, the maker of products for the plane industry, Buffett has previously cited health risks of airlines.
The billionaire said in 2001 that hed sworn off investing in airline stocks after earlier lamenting the mistake of betting on US Airways Group Inc. He added that the industry had been unprofitable from the time of Wilbur and Orville Wright through 1991.
Now if I get the urge to invest in airlines, I call an 800 number, and I say: Hello, my name is Warren, and Im an air-o-holic, he said. Sometimes, it takes them 10 minutes to talk me out of it, sometimes more.
The latest picks may have involved one of his investing deputies, Todd Combs or Ted Weschler. Buffett often restriction himself to buying bigger stakes, such as holds in Wells Fargo& Co. or Coca-Cola Co.
American jumped 4.1 percent to $45.20 at 5:52 p.m. in extended trading in New York. Delta climbed 3.4 percentage to $49.10. United Continental rose 2.2 percentage to $64.35. Southwest advanced 3.3 percent.
The U.S. airline industry has stabilized with a series of consolidations that started in 2005 and ran through 2013, reducing the number of major carriers to four from nine. Since that time, carriers largely have focused on build strength out of their biggest hub airports and into international markets.
Most of the mergers followed insolvency restructurings by all of the nations full-fare airlines with global operations. U.S. carriers lost a combined $53 billion from 2001 through 2011, before returning to profitability.
Berkshires move provokes Buffetts disclosure in 2007 that he invested in several railroads, David Kass, a prof at the University of Marylands Robert H. Smith School of Business, said in an interview. The billionaire chose subsequently to buy BNSF and exit considers in its rivals.
The airline industry has pretty much rationalized itself, similar to railroads, Kass said, citing consolidation that reduced competition. They have their sort-of monopoly routes, they can expense as they choose to maximize gains, and there are huge barriers to entry.
Buffett has previously communicated his admiration for Southwest co-founder Herb Kelleher, likening him to Sam Walton, who helped construct Wal-Mart Stores Inc. into the worlds largest retailer.
Berkshire cut its Wal-Mart stake in the third one-quarter by about two-thirds to 13 million shares. Buffetts company exited a holding in Suncor Energy Inc. Berkshire didnt return a message seeking comment.
Buffett increased his bet on Phillips 66 in the three month ended Sept. 30, but that addition was previously disclosed. Berkshire owns such a large stake that it must report trades in the refiner soon after attaining them, rather than waiting for the quarterly regulatory filing.
Delta greets new investors as we continue to build a model for sustainable, long-term success as a high-quality global company, the Atlanta-based airline said in a statement.
American also was pleased with the news, went on to say that, This investment further reinforces our view that our industry has basically changed in a profound and lasting style.
Read more: www.bloomberg.com
Harvard researchers predict 57% of children will grow up obese Its definitely a shocking and sobering number says lead author
More than half of the rights of children growing up in America today could be obese by the time they are middle-aged, according to new projections.
Harvard University’s TH Chan School of Public Health found that 57% of US children will be obese by the time they are 35 years old, in part because of increased childhood obesity rates.
” It’s definitely a shocking and sobering number, ” said Zachary Ward, the lead writer on such studies.” But if you look at trends in weight gain over the past 40 years, it’s not too surprising we’re heading in this direction. ”
” This could just become the new normal the way things are going , ” Ward said.” There are areas of the country among some subgroups where we’re already approaching this level of obesity. ”
Researchers at Harvard use body mass indicator, or a measure that uses height and weight is required to determine whether a person is obese, to develop a model utilizing the data provided by more than 41,000 children between two and 19 years old.
The study use data regarding five investigates that nationally represent the US population in 2016. Researchers then built” virtual populations” of more than 1 million children who were 19 or younger. This was done 1,000 hours.
Some of the study’s most startling findings were for children deemed severely obese. Children in this group were more likely than not to remain obese by age 35. Researcher described the trajectory of risk as “striking”.
” A two-year-old who is obese is more likely to be obese at 35 years of age than an overweight 19 -year-old, ” the study saw. A child who is severely obese at age two has only a one-in-five chance of not being obese by 35. By age five, that opportunity is halved to one-in-1 0. ”
The worldwide obesity rate has doubled since 1980, and the United States has the highest rates of obesity among high-income countries. Currently, about one in three American adults are held obese, and about one in seven children.
” We’re having to learn how to treat hypertension and lipidemia and Type-II diabetes in children, ” said Dr Chris Bolling, a pediatrician in Kentucky and an expert in childhood obesity who was not involved in the study.” That’s new province for pediatricians. ”
Between 1990 and 2010, obesity among children grew 60%, in agreement with the Harvard TH Chan School of Medicine. In 2010, 43 million preschool children in the US were considered overweight or obese.
Obesity is defined as having a body mass index of 30 or higher, a measurement that uses a person’s height and weight to find a numerical representation of whether they are at a healthy weight.
For example, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention deems a person who is 5ft 9in and between 125 to 168 lbs a healthy weight. The person or persons weighing 203 lbs or more is considered obese.
Such articles was revised on 30 November 2017 to correct the name of Harvard’s TH Chan School of Public Health. We originally referred to it as the TH Chan School of Medicine.
Cocktails and canapes: Rosie Sykes cleverly pairs edible treats with a perfect festive pick-me-up
Some days demand a stiff drink and a bite to eat, whether it’s a cosy night on the sofa, or the bright lights of Christmas. In this extract from her new book, Rosie Sykes cleverly pairs each edible treat with a perfect festive pick-me-up …
Cooling like marble, nearly flinty and savoury. Decorated with diced lime, lemon, orange and a zigzag of bay leaf to create a jazzy terrazzo consequence, this fizzy aperitivo employs Cocchi Americano- a bitter Italian aperitif wine with citrus and herbal flavours- stimulating it the perfect start to any party.
If you’ve ever attempted a sweaty elliptical sesh the morning after having one too many tequila shots, you know things do not typically end well. From dizziness, to nausea, to the sudden advise to wear your Ray-Bans indoors, drinking and deadlifts merely don’t seem to mix. Still, you continue to hit the gym, even after a side timber on a hungover stomach virtually makes you puke, and you wonder, does alcohol affect your workout?
From being a depressant to slackening your recovery day, it’s pretty clear that drinking doesn’t impact your time in the gym positively. Some fitness fanatics have even chosen to abstain from alcohol completely so their bodies feel amazing and ready to slay a cardio circuit at a moment’s notification. In fact, one of the most influential people in the fitness world, Kayla Itsines, proudly abstains from alcohol and has said she’ll likely never drink again in her life.
Elite Daily spoke with Dr. Anthony Balduzzi, founder of the Fit Father Project, to learn about some of the effects that permanently chucking your Cabernet out of your life may bring to your #gains.
Here are five things you may notice in the gym when you abstain from alcohol — you know, besides being able to sweat it out sans sunglasses.
Going to the gym is hard enough already, but when you’re tired AF, it’s nearly impossible.
Dr. Balduzzi tells Elite Daily,
Alcohol selectively disrupts rapid eye movement( REM) sleep, which is one of the body’s most essential forms of sleep for exercise recovery.
During REM sleep, growth hormone naturally rises to mend injury muscles, while also burning fat.
Interestingly, Dr. Balduzzi expressed the view that alcohol’s impairment of REM sleep is based on the tolerance of each person.
But, generally speaking, the more you drink, the more your sleep will be affected. Abstaining entirely is likely to be the surest way to improve your sleep and your ability to recover after a challenging workout.
According to research published in the, alcohol consumption is associated with a decrease in muscle and lean body mass. The research revealed that alcohol might negatively impair the proteins that activate muscle growth, thus halting the #gains.
And if that doesn’t persuade you to toss your bottle of tequila, another study from Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine showed that drinking lessens levels of human growth hormone( HGH) by about 70 percent. HGH is important for both muscle growth and mend, so heavy drinkers might just be sabotaging their progress in the gym without even knowing it.
Dr. Balduzzi explains some of the negative impact alcohol can have on your metabolism, and in turn, your fitness goals 😛 TAGEND
Our bodies view alcohol as a metabolic toxin. When we drink, our livers kick into overdrive to break alcohol and abolishing it from the body.
In the process of metabolizing and eliminating the alcohol, our bodies’ put the breaks’ on fat, carb, and protein oxidation.
Dr. Balduzzi adds that, the more you drink, the greater that blunting consequence on fat burning.
After a heavy night of drinking, your body can take up to 48 hours to totally eradicate the alcohol. Removing alcohol completely from your diet ensures you avoid this scenario.
You know those torturous post-leg-day feelings? Alcohol was in fact enhance them.
Scientists from Massey University in New Zealand found that people who tended to be heavier drinkers experienced more soreness after a conference in the weight room.
There’s nothing worse than impression dehydrated during a lengthy elliptical sesh. No matter how much water you drink, adding alcohol in the mixture can make it difficult to stay properly hydrated.
Dr. Balduzzi tells Elite Daily,
Alcohol is a diuretic. After drinking, your brain releases a series of hormones that tell your kidneys to increase urine production significantly to help the body get rid of the alcohol.
If you’ve ever’ broken the seal’ while drinking, you know what I’m talking about.
He explains that, since your kidneys are running “over-time” with your liver to metabolize the alcohol, your body pee-pee out key minerals that play important roles in things like bone health, blood pressure, and more. Losing minerals( and hydration) is sure to negatively impact fitness progress in the long-run.