As the old aphorism says, its difficult to construct predictions, especially about the future. Assessing the legacy of Barack Obama will be easier in a few decades when we can see the long-term consequences of his presidential decisions and initiatives.
An immediate analysis of his science and technology policies, however, exposes significant accomplishments in the promotion of science and technology, education, space exploitation, clean energy, climate change and the environment. While major endeavors like the Precision Medicine Initiative and Paris climate arrangement received the headlines, they were part of a larger, mostly successful aim to restore science to its rightful place and exert technologys wonders in forming and enforcing government policy.
The administrations shortcomings around science some of which reflected Republican political pressures included limited funding overall and traveling restrictions for government workers, both of which reduced the effectiveness of positive science and tech policies.
Psyched about science
In office Obama was basically an optimist about the potential of science and technology to improve society and safely expand the economy. His most significant( and low profile) near-term initiatives elevated and institutionalized the foundations of scientific research exploration, data-based experimentation and policy, openness, transparency, and access to information into routine government activities. These steps should accelerate the commercialization and diffusion of research.
Many changes were small but improved the efficiency of programs. For instance, adjustments made based on the outcomes of behavioral science experimentations increased military employees participation in the Thrift Saving Plan while cutting program costs.
One visible sign of the significance the Obama administration placed on making sure research results constructed it out of labs and into practice was the expansion of the phrase science and technology( S& T) to science, technology and innovation( ST& I) by president Obama. The created in the new positions of federal Chief Technology Officer, Chief Information Security Officer, and Chief Data Officer was another show of this integration.
Obama strongly supported science, technology, engineering and math STEM education. Hosting science carnivals at the White House garnered lots of media attention. But other initiatives within the administrations Educate to Innovate campaign will prove more consequential in improving K-1 2 education in America. For instance, the 100Kin10 attempt aims to train 100,000 new science teachers by 2021, STEM for All fosters active learn for the increasingly diverse student population, and SkillCommons generates open-source online software for education.
Environmentally, Obama focused on slowing global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting renewable energy and increasing the efficiency of energy use domestically and internationally. The incoming Trump administration with its climate deniers may try to reverse many of Obamas policies, but the last eight years have significantly reshaped the structure of energy production and intake worldwide. In 2015, new energy capacity from renewables exceeded new capability from fossil fuels for the first time.
In space, the Obama administration strongly promoted commercialization, directing NASA to pay private firms to launch supplies and, in 2018, astronauts to the International Space Station. This should reduce the high cost of reaching earth orbit and thus the exploration and exploitation of space.
While attracting fewer headlines, initiatives on space climate and the asteroids and comets that might strike our planet may end up preserving civilization. In 1859, an extremely powerful solar blizzard disrupted Earths magnetic field. A similar Carrington event today would destroy spacecrafts and much of the worlds electric power transmission grid. Worst-case scenarios( always good for pushing people to act) predict hundreds of millions of people succumbing because of the loss of electric power for years. A large asteroid striking Earth could devastate a large region, kill millions, and trigger a new ice age.
Guarding against these rare but inevitable natural events will not excite voters, but demonstrates preventive stewardship. These initiatives coordinated government efforts across multiple departments to predict a dangerous event, provide warn, and equip spacecrafts and terrestrial infrastructure to minimize damage and maximize resiliency.
On the other hand, curtailed traveling
One major negative effect on science from the Obama administration was its crippling of federal employees attending conferences.
In 2010, the General Services Administration, which supports federal agencies, held a lavish meeting in Las Vegas. Congressional Republicans and Democrat assaulted this very visible misuse of taxpayer dollars. In reply, the Obama administration overreacted by sharply restricting federal spending on conferences and creating an elaborate, expensive bureaucratic process for government employees to get permission to attend a meeting, workshop or other professional meetings. Reflecting these restrictions, the number of defense scientists attending the Defense Security and Scanning conference of the International Society for Optic and Photonics dropped from 648 in 2012 to 206 in 2013, for example.
Serendipitous face to face interactions are a crucial part of scientific gatherings. CTBTO, CC BY
The sharply curtailed government presence frustrated scientific societies and researchers, both federal employees and those in academia and representatives of the private sector. Despite the increasing ease of electronic communications, professional sessions remain one of the most productive routes for people to learn, exchange and debate ideas.
By decreasing a chance for researchers to meet in person, the Obama administration hurt the ingenuity and productivity of the entire ST& I community , not only federal employees. This was an solely self-inflicted wound.
No real progress on cybersecurity
Cybersecurity remains a weak area for the Obama administration. The White House released a policy review in 2009, voluntary guidelines for critical infrastructure in 2013 and its cybersecurity report last month.
But while Obama was in office, new cyber issues maintained emerging. The theft of millions of records from the Office of Personnel Management by China, the manipulation of the presidential election by Russia, issues of privacy and surveillance, economic cyberespionage and the growing range of cybercrimes all exemplify the axiom, Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.
In fairness, cybersecurity was a fairly low priority throughout the country. There were apparently few consequences to firms that fail to maintain adequate defenses. The onu of identity stealing, for example, falls on the individual. The revelations of American cyberspying by Edward Snowden and the deployment of the American-Israeli computer Stuxnet virus to destroy Iranian uranium centrifuges put the Obama administration on the defensive. Congressional and business skepticism, some partisan but mostly motivated by disagreement about what to do, resulted in little legislative initiatives.
And never enough fund
Perhaps the most important point shortcoming of the Obama administrations science and technology agenda was its inability to increase S& T funding.
Partly this reflects the demographic tendency of an aging U.S. population focused more on its retirement and medical costs than investing in research and development for the future. As more people retire and live longer, entitlements like Social security systems and Medicare increasingly crowd out the discretionary part of the federal budget.
Coupled with budget battles with Congressional Republicans, including a costly government shutdown in 2013 and sequestration, research results has been near-stagnant ST& I budgets. Thats in contrast to the long-term increases proposed by the president in 2009 to expand public and private spending on the investigations and developing from 2.8 to 3.0 percent of GDP.
Consequently, many possibilities ran unfunded or underfunded. Success rates for awards from the National Institute of Health, National Science Foundation and NASA all decreased. Indeed, President Obama in 2010 and again in 2016 called for sending astronauts to Mars but did not try to convince Congress to fund that undertaking, the most recent of a series of chairmen to do so.
Science rightful place ?
Unsurprisingly, the Obama administrations rhetoric outpaced its resources and limiteds. Nonetheless, the 44 th chairperson left a strong legacy of supporting ST& I not just for the goals of discovery and economic growth but to strengthen democracy and improve the processes of government.
If its campaign tweets, transition personnel, and cabinet appointments are any show, the incoming Trump administration will provide a very strong contrast. With top officials at odds with the data-based, open scientific approach on many issues, science, technology, and innovation may take a beating.
Jonathan Coopersmith, Professor of History, Texas A& M University
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.