All about feed
Most of the cows suffering from hot stress react with a lower dry matter uptake( DMI ). A reduced DMI instantly effects the energy balance. Another important hazard is increased ratio of concentrates to roughage, especially when feeding a partially mixed …
Having sex with person for the first time is super exciting, and there’s really no time frame for when it’s right.
There are times when I’ve hit it off with somebody so intensely that we’ve had sex on the first date. There are other days when we’ve gone on a few dates before doing it, and still others where we were friends for so long that we never had a date to begin with.
Feelings don’t stick to a strict schedule. That’s why I’ve learnedto tune into what’s going on with me, what kind of connect I’m sensing, and where I’m at physically as well.
These are the things that help me figure out whether or not I’m ready to have sex with person for the first time.
1. I Felt Comfortable
Before I have sex with somebody, I need to know that they are respectful of me. This includes firm confidence that they will pay attention to my borders and listen if I convey discomfort.
According to Dr. Nikki Goldstein, expert sexologist and author of, these boundaries vary depending on who you are.
For some people, sex on the first date or early on is fine, and the objective is comfortable with it. For others, they need to feel connected, intimate, and safe with person before they jump into bed, Dr. Goldstein told Elite Daily.
For me, these lines vary depending on how I’m feeling. Casually seeing someone versus looking to seriously date them also plays a role. There’s no incorrect boundary to set, though, and it’s important to listen to your intestine instinct, whether you’re heading out on your first date or your 31 st.
Feeling comfortable also entails knowing that the person goes into the bedroom with an open intellect, that they’re into providingpleasure to their partner and not just seeking their own, and that they’ll be appreciative of what happens , no matter what.
Obviously, this can’t all be gauged before actually going to bed with someone. But before I have sex with the person or persons I’m seeing, I wantto have a pretty good notion of how they’ll act in the bedroom.
2. I KnewThey Were EmotionallyInvested
Before I have sex with person, I don’t need to think that we are going to spend the rest of our lives together or anything. At this point, I doubt I’m guessing beyond the next week.
What I do need, though, is to feel like the person I am ensure is equally invested in me emotionally. I also need to be pretty confident that that investment isn’t going to disappear as soon as we have sex.
Of course, there is always a risk that a person who is attached at first will become emotionally unavailablelater. Paying close attention to their behavior over time should help you gauge whether or not you’re with a person who is going to flake.
I can tell whether or not a person is into me by insuring how they treat me. It’s definitely more about what they do than what a person tells. Does she respond to my text within a reasonable sum of period? Does he get in touch with me if I haven’t hit him up?
If I am in doubt about how a person feels aboutme well, it’s better to ask than to stay in the dark. Some people are shy or slow to answer. A simple question ahead of time can save you a lot of pain down the road.
3. I Felt Good About Myself With And Without Them
When I was younger, before I was fully in control of my sex life, I think there were definitely a few occasions where I rushed into sex to please the other person.
I didn’t have the best self-esteem when I was younger, and I’ll admit that sometimes, I had sexuality as a confidence boost. More often than not, however, this backfired.
Sometimes, this happened before we even talked about one another’s sex health a conversation that, these days, I feel is an absolute must.
I know I am ready to have sex with somebody when I’m not entirely focused on how they’ll think ofme in bed. If I am emotionally close to them and comfortable, I’ll be more interested in our reciprocal pleasure of each other.
And when it comes right down to it, I will have the confidence to know that it’s 99 percent likely that my partner will have a good time. If they don’t, I’ll also be in a place where I’m able to say that it’s them and not me.
4. I Felt In Control
When it’s the first time with somebody new, I know that if I feelin control of my wishes and my body, then the sexuality has a better likelihood ofnot being totally awkward.
Being nervous the first time you’re having sexuality with the person you’re find is pretty normal. You’re not familiar with their body, their predilections, and what feels good to them.
That’s actually kind of amazing because it means that this is your chance to communicate and begin to explore one another.
I’ve found that being out of control induces it seem a lot less amazing and a lot more clumsy. This is especially true if we have been drinking to appease our nerves.
Waking up feeling embarrassed in the morning because you don’t know what you said or did the night before is not a great feeling. It might even attain you feel like you have to run in shame from that person you were really into 12 hours ago.
Tune into what you want and find a way to stay in control and to soothe your own fears. Clue: It won’t be at the bottom of that bottle.
5. The Timing Was Right
There are certain times of the month when I’m just more into sexuality than others. I’ve learned to be patient with the process.
When I’m ovulating, for instance, I often get cysts. I know because I have a twing-y pain in my pelvis. This has induced sex truly painful in the past. It’s definitely not worth rushing into.
As for period sexuality, I’m entirely down if I’ve been with a person long enough to know that they won’tbe weirded out by it.
If they’re not? It causes a lot of hassle and will probably lead to me feeling resentful of the person or persons I’m seeing for not being more open minded.
While my boundaries might fall a few months after going steady, it takes time for that to happen. I want to be sure my body is in alignment with my intellect when I’m having sexuality with someone for the first time.
Trust me, I know it’s tough. When you’re really into somebody, you want to hop into bed right away. And while there’s no substitute for sexuality, just think about how much that anticipation is going to turn things up a notch when you ultimately do get into bed.
While it’s not sexuality, there’s nothing incorrect with a good, old-fashioned make-out sesh if you feel you only aren’t ready yet.
( CNN) A massive global ransomware attack has struck hospitals, companies and government offices around the world, seizing control of affected computers until the main victims pay a ransom.
Hackers demand ransom in major cyberattack
Cyberattack has global reach
What one school did when hackers held its data captive
There should be a “major national investigation” into the use of cladding on high-rise towers, Theresa May says.
It comes as it was disclosed cladding from 95 towers in 32 local authority areas in England had failed flame safety exams – all of the samples submitted in so far since the Grenfell Tower fire.
An expert panel to advise on immediate safety action has been appointed.
A public inquiry has already been ordered into the 14 June blaze, which is feared to have left 79 people dead.
It has also emerged that London Fire Brigade issued a warn to all 33 London councils about panels attached to the exterior of houses in May this year, in a letter find by the BBC.
The warning was issued as a result of the fire at the Shepherd’s Court tower block in west London last year, as experts believed that insulation panels installed as part of an earlier renovation may have helped facilitate the spread of the fire up the side of the building.
Meanwhile, campaign group Justice4Grenfell has said it will set up an unofficial database of the victims of the flame amid distrust of the official death toll from police.
Who are the victims ? Guide to what happened ? Six questions for the investigation German flats cleared amid cladding anxieties Media captionGrenfell locals Layla and Hassin on how they’re coping with mental health issues Where have cladding tests failed ? Why do England’s high-rises keep failing flame exams ? Tower fails preliminary exams Media caption“I can’t do that to her”: Sabah Abdullah lost his wife in the Grenfell Tower fire
Shame on us, wrote Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times last month. The Saudis have managed to block coverage of the crimes against humanity the objective is perpetrating in Yemen, and the US backs the Saudis.
He was referring to a Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen, which now puts millions of people at risk of demise from famine.
As the new administration approaches its first 100 days, Americans who care about the future of their country have understandably been preoccupied with the humanitarian consequences of Trumps rule at home. These are things that affect us the most with us including immigrants who live here. Health insurance, the environment, education, climate change, taxation and the budget big battles have been joined, some have been won, and there are many more ahead.
But there are moments when we can help save millions of lives by taking a breaking from our daily conflicts to avoid terrible damage that our government is about to do to people thousands of miles away. This is one of those moments.
The White House is reported to be deciding this week whether to support a planned attack on the port of Hodeida, in Yemen, by a Saudi-led alliance supporting the deposed government there in its two-year old war with Houthi rebels, who now control the majority of members of Yemens population centers.
This is a port where almost 80 percent of the countrys food enters Yemen is overwhelmingly dependent on food importations, and was already the poorest country in the region prior to the opening of the U.S.-backed Saudi war. The UN reports that 3.3 million people, including 2.1 million children are already acutely malnourished. Hundreds of thousands of children could die if this port is farther destroyed in the bombing that will likely ensue if our government gives the green light and direct assistance in the operation.
Here in Washington, dozens of members of the House of Representatives have signed a bipartisan letter to the White House was put forward by by Representatives Mark Pocan( D-WI) and Justin Amash( R-MI ), demanding that Trump seek Congressional approval before a potentially disastrous escalation of US hostilities in Yemen. The letter states 😛 TAGEND
The United States has participated in Saudi-led airstrikes that have been blamed for most of Yemens 10,000 civilian deaths, creating a security vacuum that Al Qaeda has exploited to expand its base of operations. We therefore urge you to terminate US refueling for Saudi coalition warplanes and objective, rather than increase, U.S. logistical assistance provided to the Saudi-led bombings in Yemen. At minimum, any decision by the administration to engage in direct U.S. resentments against Yemens Houthis must be subject to a congressional debate and vote, as the framers of the Constitution aimed and the 1973 War Powers Resolution demands.
One might ask, why should the Trump administration care what members of Congress think about members of the military intervention in Yemen? The answer is that Trump administration officials, as well as Republican Congressional leaders, are reported to be divided as to whether to pursue this escalation.
This is clearly a war of option, with no legal footing, and where many things can go wrong.
Republican Senator Bob Corker, the influential Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, made it clear that he doesnt believe the Authorization for the Use of Military Force that Congress passed in 2001 to counter al-Qaeda are applicable in Yemens Houthis.
The Trump administration has to choose its battles, and this is clearly a war of choice, with no legal footing, and where many things can go wrong. If it looks like the White House is going to have a continual and perhaps escalating fight with Congresswhich could spill out into the media the forces within the administration that resist farther participation may prevail.
Its not like repealing Obamacare defeated for now which was a Trump campaign promise. In fact, its the opposite: Trump campaigned on a pledge not to get involved in wars other than fighting terrorism. But in this war, Al Qaeda is effectively on the side of the Saudis, whereas the Houthis who are Shia Muslims are fighting against Al Qaeda.( Some people still remember that Al Qaeda was behind the attacks that killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11 ). U.S. supporting that is essential to Saudi Arabias prosecution of this war through weapons transfers, mid-flight refueling for bombing raids, and targeting and logistical assistance is not easy to defend in public, if the White House were forced to defend it, especially when it is starving ordinary Yemenis and radicalizing them against the United States.
If you have never called your representative in Congress to ask them to sign a letter, now would be a good time to do it. You could help save hundreds of thousands of people from starvation.
Read more: www.huffingtonpost.com
A second visit to the multi-Tony winning Dear Evan Hansen , for the occasion of Taylor Trensch taking over the title role from breakout superstar Ben Platt( and brilliant Trensch is ), reminds you how incredibly perverse this musical is.
Throughout the depict, it remains unclear why the character of lank-haired, softly menacing Connor Murphy( Mike Faist ), who commits suicide, does so. Yet it is the suicide of this character that sets the musical in queasy motion. Of course, many suicides are mysterious–and extremely painful for being so inexplicable. It’s just that Dear Evan Hansen utilizes one as a plot device, after we have met that character. It stimulates little dramatic sense, and then becomes the engine of the show.
Evan builds everything around Connor’s suicide a lie, because of a prescribed-by-shrink self-affirming letter he writes to himself in the third person. Connor’s parents believe the letter was from their son to Evan, as it was detected with him.( It wasn’t. Connor was blackmailing Evan with it .) Not merely is their son’s suicide a mystery, it then becomes the lie of a deluded teenager.
From here on, Evan is in a desperate, ever crazier spin trying to maintain the lie they were friends–to maintain their parents’ faith in the innate goodness of their son, and to secure the affections of Connor’s sister Zoe( a crisp and pointedly suspicious-then-sweet Laura Dreyfuss ).
Get ready for that toe-tapper–with head-banging, jiving choreography by Danny Mefford–about stimulating up an online life for a dead kid, and an online relationship with a dead child, because you can’t face telling his parents that you weren’t friends. And get ready for that toe-tapper to include the dead kid returned as a ghost.
The rest of the original Dear Evan Hansen cast are still in place, and perhaps it says something about hour, habit, and performance, but all their performances seem sharper and more defined than this time a year ago, when they opened on Broadway.
Trensch as Evan is nervier and slighter than Platt.( You severely worry for him when Connor pushes him over early on .) Yet, for as puppyish and lost as Evan seems, he’s also acting as something of a weirdo, if not a sociopath. This the musical skirts in favor of farce.
It is not just Connor’s suicidal impressions that go unclarified in the production; so does whatever the psychological illness that Evan has. We detected how desperate it has left him feeling, and we also see in her feeling performance the effects of it on his single mom, Heidi( Tony winner Rachel Bay Jones ), whose big song in Act II offsets her nervy attempts to find a way to connect Evan preceding it.
The musical voices a lot lighter than its dark tendencies. This is really about broken children, and broken adults trying to keep them as safe and loved because they can even as the broken children break even harder in front of them.
You will be aware of much crying and sniffling around you, and this is down to the specificity of the writing of both volume( Steven Levenson) and songs( Benj Pasek and Justin Paul, with orchestrations by Alex Lacamoire ). The anthems are not just about heartbreak and loss but about more difficult impressions, like ambivalence about a loved one’s death, as Zoe feels about Connor, who was relentlessly cruel to her. The musical has a lot of jagged edges and unresolved feelings that stay unresolved and hidden in its hummable songs.
Michael Park as Connor’s dad is particularly penetrating, bonding cautiously with Evan, who has never had a daddy. Jennifer Laura Thompson as Mike’s desolate mom clings to Evan, and cooks for him. This part-confected household grouping requires one another, even if that need is based on a lie.
Evan also needs Jared( Will Roland ), the most asshole-ish co-conspirator a nervous schemer could ever wish for. His mirth at fabricating an email relationship between Evan and Connor, and his reminders to Evan about the perversity of his project, are a welcome lighten of the musical’s mood and needed winks to us from the writers and producer that yes, this is all very strange.
Around the characters loom screens of scrolling messages and online crazes, effectively designed by David Korins, triggered by Evan and Connor’s story. Alana( Kristolyn Lloyd ), a high school high-achiever, is as swept up in its aftermath as anyone else, and–like Evan and like everyone–seeks to make-up more out of a connection to Connor in demise than she ever shared in life.
The musical is as much a irony of internet pile-ons and social media sorrow huddles as it is about confused youth. The absurdity merely maintains getting bigger, and as Connor’s story becomes a huge phenomenon, Evan becomes more scared about telling the truth.
Trensch’s skill is to transition in a winking from tormented teen, his body contorted like a pretzel, to the belting Broadway star( he previously played Barnaby Tucker in the Bette Midler Hello, Dolly ! ). One doesn’t invalidate the other. But his astonishing singing voice reminds you why he is on stage. The objective of the demonstrate feels rushed. You wonder if everything would be resolved so neatly after, well, all that .
But by then, if you are not crying or feeling a little stunned, you might also be delighted to see such a fine company acting and singing up such a storm.
You wonder not just at their energy, but also at their accomplished is committed to building Dear Evan Hansen plausible. They pare the extremity of the demonstrate back to the basics of broken children and flawed but basically good mothers; they construct the characters believable and close. And Trensch is so good he deserves to leave the prove as much of a breakout starring as Platt, who–as good timing would have it–secured his first result film role on the same day as Trensch’s opening night.
Dear Evan Hansen is at the Music Box Theatre, 239 West 45 th Street, New York City. Book tickets here .
‘ Flight ‘
It is fitting that Flight should be at the McKittrick Hotel, New York home most famously of Sleep No More . Like Sleep No More , Flight is its own work of particular wonder, and please do all you can to go and see it. It is a story of migration, an escape to a better life of two orphaned brothers from Afghanistan, the older Aryan and younger Kabir.
You merely hear rather than consider the actors: Farshid Rokey as Aryan and Nalini Chetty as Kabir. You sit in a darkened booth and watch the action unfold in front of you in a series of boxes and tableaux inhabited by miniature models( Rebecca Hamilton is the lead model decorator, imparting so much on such small figures ), with crisp narration by Emun Elliott.
Everything works in smooth tandem. Simon Wilkinson’s lighting within the boxes and tableaux helps move us through night and day, whole continents, the plains of mountains, sparkling sea, and abruptly a door opens a crack and there is a sliver of illuminate aimed right at you.
Flight is visually stunning and incredibly powerful as a story, as we follow the sons from the mountains of Afghanistan through Greece and Italy, France, and then finally, will they make it to London?
The tales of Aryan and Kabir are fictional, but an amalgam of stories that journalist Caroline Brother amassed from interviewing real-life refugees and asylum seekers across Europe, in preparation for her novel Hinterland .
Oliver Emanuel sensitively adapted Brothers’ work into the play, directed by Candice Edmunds and Jamie Harrison, co-artistic directors of Scottish theater company Vox Motus.
You hear the boys’ story through a pair of headphones, and it is not just voices in Mark Melville’s all-surrounding soundscape, but the whoosh of waves, the blur of traffic, and the nasty audio of seagulls, which are imagined as the threatening authorities. There is even the heroic spirit guidebook of Bruce Willis, and if you ever wondered how Die Hard should look as a model, wonder no longer.
The sensation is genuinely immersive. At one moment you really do feel as if you are being battered by the ocean waves as the boys’ barge is; or playing football with them; or having a random encounter with a bunch of rich young lady from America, keen to buy them colorful sneakers.
You see the sons peering through a cake shop’s window in Paris, you feel their desperation as they face all manner of exploitation. There is terror and there is joy, and there is also the affirmation of a quest, a desire for better, of sheer grit and determination–and the piercing realization that such journeys have one various kinds of misfortune at their beginning and sometimes another totally different one at their aim. And even after all that, the quest continues.
Flight is at the McKittrick Hotel, 530 West 27 th Street, New York City. Book through April 8 here .
Read more: www.thedailybeast.com
The table-reads were a disaster, the network detested the scripts and the writers fretted theyd ruined the whole show from the Chinese Restaurant to the Contest, heres the truth behind the sitcoms best bits
The Chinese Restaurant
Jeremiah Bosgang and his boss Rick Ludwin found themselves in a real bind after a table-read for a Seinfeld episode in 1991. The script theyd just heard had Elaine, George and Jerry doing nothing except waiting for a table at a Chinese eatery. There was no action beyond a pay phone call and an attempt to bribe the maitre d. The pair had championed many of the displays stranger moments, but now they were considering shutting it down.
Theyd been worried about the script from the get-go. Was this thing missing pages or something? There was no tale! What would the other NBC executives say? To Bosgang, it corroborated the networks worst anxieties about Larry David and Seinfeld that they couldnt hack it making a sitcom long-term. They didnt think they could sell a concept this flimsy. Theyd gone to the table-read in hopes of find advance but thered been no change. Now they sat in Bosgangs automobile and agreed that killing the script was too provocative. David, especially, would not take this lightly. But they also knew how precarious Seinfelds future was. They had to say something.
Indeed, David balked even when Ludwin told gingerly If you feel passionate about this, which you plainly do, run do it, and well hope for the best. He took David for a walk around the plenty and allowed him to ventilate. David was adamant it was a funny half-hour of television about lifes little annoyances. It was Seinfeld. If the network didnt like this, they didnt like the show.
In fact, the script mystified even the man who played the Chinese restaurant host. Actor James Hong conveyed his embarrassment. The director Tom Cherones ensure it as similar to his own early feelings about the show. That doesnt matter, he told Hong. Just go with it.
Read more: www.theguardian.com
Despite massive government, medical and individual efforts to win the war on obesity, 71 percent of Americans are overweight. The median adult is 24 pounds heavier today than in 1960. Our growing girth adds some US $200 billion per year to our health care expenditure, is tantamount to a severe health crisis.
Drug research has not yielded a pill that helps people lose weight and keep it off. Traditional approaches such as diet and exert can work short-term, but people almost inevitably regain the weight. Randomized controlled trials of weight loss surgery have shown some improvements in diabetes but not in mortality, cancer and cardiovascular disease.
If there is ever to be a pill a solution to weight it will be changing the brain, especially the primitive areas of the brain, the emotional brain or mammalian and reptilian brain. These areas house circuits that control stress and our stress-fueled emotions, thoughts and behaviours. These circuits can be rewired in humans so by changing them, we have a chance to address the root cause of stress-related problems, including obesity. While some overweight and obesity are caused by genetic make-up, more and more research is indicating that stress plays a big role in weight gain. Many people under stress turn to food for comfort.
My colleagues and I set out to develop a neuroscience-based approach to weight management and dealing with the common excesses we all face, through emotional brain training. The notion was to use neuroscience-based tools to change the brain so that the whole range of common excess would fade. The method has shown promising results.
The emotional brain is command central for weight and common excess. It includes the dread, reward and starvation centers. When that brain is in stress, all three centers promote overeating and weight gain. We have strong drives to do exactly what we know we shouldnt do. We cant help it! Our emotional brain is in stress.
That stress ramps up the reward value of food, increases hunger for carbohydrates and decreases metabolic rate, almost ensuring weight gain. The stress-obesity link has been well-documented. Our supposing brain( neocortex) goes off line, and the extremes of our emotional brain calls the shots.
To Take Care Of Your Body, Take Care Of Your Brain
Levels of stress. via www.shutterstock.com
The first step in taking control of our weight is to destress the emotional brain. In emotional brain train( EBT ), we release stress by checking in several times throughout the day, identifying our level of stress and using the technique for that stress level to spiral up to a country of well-being.
There are five high levels of stress and five tools. To get an idea of how they work, take a few breaths, check in with yourself and identify your stress level. Then use the tools for that level of stress to reduce your stress rapidly.
1. Compassion Tool( Stress Level 1 – Very Low Stress ) Tell to yourself, Feel compassion for myself, then wait for a wave of compassion to flow through your body. Next tell, Feel compassion for others, and feel a slight wave of warmth. Last, tell, Feel compassion for all living beings. 2. Feelings Tool( Stress Level 2 – Low Stress ) Ask yourself, How do I feel? Often, three impressions bubble up, but wait long enough so that one impression is the strongest. Thats the one! Next ask yourself, What do I require? and, ultimately, Do I need subsistence? 3. Flow Tool( Stress Level 3 – A Little Stress ) Tell the words: I feel angry that and watch what words arrive in your mind to complete the sentence. State the sentence again, for seven more feelings: sad, afraid, guilty, grateful, happy, secure and proud. Notice the light in your body and how your stress is go. Why? When we feel our negative feelings, they fade. We are no longer in peril and the brain naturally focuses on positive impressions that dedicate us the energy to move forward and do good things in our life.
4. Cycle Tool( Stress Level 4 – High Stress) Start by stating what is bothering you( dont hold back !), then protest that stress by saying I feel angry that I cant stand it that I hate it that. and each time watch what words arrive in your intellect. This can unlock the circuit so that you can change at a deeper level. Pause and take a few deep breaths, then say the words: I feel sad that I feel afraid that I feel guilty that and watch what terms arrive in your intellect to complete each sentence.
Next support yourself, and say, Of course I could do that( such as overeat) because my unreasonable expectation is and again wait for words to bubble up from your unconscious mind, such as: I get my security from overeating. Thats just an old glitch of a memory that needs updating. So, update it! Say the opposite expectation( such as I cannot get my safety from food I can get my safety from connecting to myself ). As you stated this when the circuit was freshly unlocked, the circuit can change into the expectation of your opt. As the new expectation becomes dominant, the emotional drives for various excess( including food) can start to fade so that changing behavior becomes easier.
5. Damage Control Tool( Stress Level 5 – Very High Stress ) When were that stressed, we need to be held and comforted. Sometimes only rocking in your chair or exhaling deep helps. Also, you can say pacifying words repeatedly: Do not judge. Minimize harm. Know it will pass. After all, its merely stress and it will fade.
Survival Circuits Activate Strong Emotional Drives To Overeat
Once youve started releasing stress from your emotional brain, chances are youll notice that you still get triggered sometimes. You might even blame yourself for that late night binge or that mindless eating. Actually, its only a survival circuit.
They are encoded whenever it is stressed and reach for food to cope. The brain remembers that food saved us from stress, this is why it encodes an expectation, such as I get my security from food. That circuit can be replayed for a lifetime, fueling maladaptive eating.
Research now shows that these survival circuits can be rewired and we do that in EBT. In fact, they can only be rewired when we are stressed. Merely then does the circuit unlock and make change more lasting. When stressed and craving food, the EBT user reaches for a tool rather than for the food and uses it to stop the craving and change the circuit. The drive to overeat fades.
The Last Step: Keeping The Weight Off
Keeping weight off is hard but it may be easier if we improve the brains emotional setpoint. Often a setpoint in stress is encoded from adverse experiences early in life and causes chronic stress overload in the emotional brain, a put up for weight regain.
The solution is to move up the emotional setpoint, so we get the emotional brain out of chronic stress, which is why the EBT program is also intended to creating the setpoint, so participants are more resilient to new emphasizes, less likely to regain the weight they have lost and, most of all, to experience more elation in their daily lives.
Read more: www.iflscience.com
NEW YORK( CNN) Is there a better metaphor for athletic achievement than tower go? It’s a horizontal sprint of power and endurance to greater and greater heights. And you always come out on top.