Trumps health and human services secretary nominees record clues at his ideas, including selling insurance across state lines and less generous subsidies
Donald Trumps choice of Georgia congressman Tom Price as health and human services secretary indicates his campaign rhetoric attacking Obamacare was more than mere bluster.
In Price 12 years in Congress, he has been a fierce critic of Barack Obamas signature healthcare legislation while championing conservative proposals, such as selling insurance across state lines, replacing Medicare with a system of vouchers and transforming Medicaid into a block grant. A close ally of the House speaker, Paul Ryan, he has voted to repeal Obamacare dozens of times.
However, even if Price is able to re-envision health policy, some experts believe he dangers undermining benefits to some of the president-elects most ardent supporters.
Current estimates show that 20 million Americans gained health insurance as a result of Obamacare, either through individual exchanges, Medicaid or by allowing older children to stay on their parents plans.
That entails Republicans are between a rock and a hard place, according to Professor Michael Sparer, chair of health policy at Columbia Universitys Mailman School of Public Health. How could we simultaneously keep our promise to repeal and replace the[ Affordable Care Act] without leading to millions of freshly uninsured folks, without facing a political backlash because of those newly uninsured folks, and without spending a whole lot of money? said Sparer, outlining what he felt was the GOP position. I think thats not easy to do.
Some experts believe policies championed by Price could actually worsens health coverage for the poor and infirm, while benefiting the healthy and wealthy.
During his time in Congress, Price attained several proposals to replace Obamacare. His schemes have included replacing the ACAs individual mandate with taxation credits and punitive continuous coverage requirements, permitting companies to sell insurance across country lines, and building Medicaid which was expanded by the Affordable Care Act a block grant program, which would dedicate countries more discretion in determining who and what to cover.
Jonathan Oberlander, a prof at the University of North Carolina who studies health policy, said Prices plan to repeal the individual mandate the ACA requirement that people buy health insurance or suffer a taxation penalty was more severe than the current system; in a 2015 proposal, for example, Price suggested that if people do not maintain continuous coverage they be denied health insurance coverage for a pre-existing condition for up to 18 months after buying insurance, according to NPR.
Prices proposed subsidies for individual insurance schemes are also less generous. Currently the average subsidy is $3,480 a year, according to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid, the federal body that administers the programs. The most generous tax credit in Prices plan is $3,000 a year.
Other proposals, such as selling insurance across state lines, could also disproportionately benefit the healthy, experts said. Purchasing across state lines could allow young people to buy inexpensive, less comprehensive health plans, and leave a sicker population in highly regulated nations. Supporters of selling insurance across state lines argue it increases competition.
If you repeal the ACA and put one of those replacement plans into law, were going to go backwards, said Oberlander. Were going to go back to that world where millions of Americans surely couldnt afford[ insurance ].
Public programs, such as Medicaid( for the poor) and Medicare( for the disabled and elderly) cover about one-third of Americans. As a congressman, Prices proposals have consistently appeared to rein in the federal governments spending on these programs. Together they make up 86% of HHSs budget.
For example, one of Prices 2015 proposals would have transformed Medicaid into a country block award, similar to what happened to welfare through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program in the 1990 s.
How much money nations get from welfare reform was determined by what they spent in 1994, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive thinktank. But in the case of Medicaid, that model would create winners and losers.
The 19 states that refused to expand Medicaid spend less fund, meaning they would get less federal cash in that block grant calculation. But if legislators use pre-Obamacare Medicaid spending to determine block grants, that proposal would anger the 32 states that did expand Medicaid.
Some regions that heavily supported Trump are especially dependent on these programs, such as in West Virginia, where 68% of voters cast ballots for Trump and almost half the population receives healthcare through a public program.
Just 40% of West Virginians are insured through employers, the third-lowest rate in the nation. Meanwhile, 29% of state residents are on Medicaid and 19% Medicare, the most in the country. Medicaid enrollment in West Virginia grew by 62% after Obamacare went into force, covering an additional 230,000 people, according to Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-profit focused on health issues.
Read more: www.theguardian.com